Depthboot vs EupneaOS vs Crouton vs RW_LEGACY vs UEFI
This is a small pros and cons summary of the different methods of running Linux on Chromebooks. It should help you decide which method is best for you.
Depthboot
- Pros:
- Can be used on any x86_64 Chromebook
- Offers Pop!_OS, Ubuntu, Arch and Fedora as a base
- Offers Gnome, KDE, XFCE, LXDE, Deepin, Budgie and a cli version as desktop environments
- Cons:
- Can only be used on x86_64 Chromebooks with depthcharge
- Has to be built locally (why?)
- May take a long time to build on weaker Chromebooks
- Pros:
EupneaOS
- Pros:
- Based on a stable, yet up2date distro, Fedora
- Comes with a customized KDE desktop environment, which eases the transition from ChromeOS
- Supports both Depthcharge and UEFI/RW_LEGACY
- Cons:
- No deskop environment choice
- No distro choice
- Pros:
RW_Legacy:
- Pros:
- Can boot all generic Linux isos
- Cons:
- Not available on all Chromebooks
- Not all hardware may work correctly
- Pros:
UEFI:
- Pros:
- Can boot all generic Linux isos
- Removes coreboot -> ability to autoboot Linux without user interaction
- Removes some stock firmware issues
- Cons:
- Not available on all Chromebooks
- Requires unscrewing the Chromebook or buying a special cable
- Slight chance of bricking the Chromebook
- Pros: